Ribery shines in dour victory

27 03 2008

France defeated England 1-0 at the Stade de France in a stale game in which Franck Ribery was one of the few shining lights. The Bayern Munich man was a human dynamo and lit up the Stade de France with inspirational runs and good interplay that galvanised an otherwise pedestrian display. Ribery linked up particularly well with Nicolas Anelka, who also had a very good game, as the two took the match to the English.

It was these two who made the breakthrough, when on the half hour mark Anelka ran onto a deftly timed pass from Francois Clerc which split the defence and was then upended by David James. Up stepped Ribery and confidently put the penalty away. It was that kind of night, that kind of performance, that a miss was near unthinkable – Ribery was truly in inspired form.

That most of the French team were rather uninspired made Ribery stand out, and made his performance all the more important, as one shudders to think where the inspiration would’ve come from had he not played. Anelka aside, the French team only showed sporadic signs of what they are capable of: Malouda, as is his habit, briefly came alive and suddenly looked world class, and then couldn’t be bothered again; Makelele was quite excellent in the last third of the match, but it was rather late as by this time the wind was already out of England’s sails.

And then there was Trezeguet – or was there? To be honest, unless I’d seen his name on the teamsheet then I would’ve thought that the shots of him pulling those baby-face agonised expressions came from a Trezeguet in the stands. Last night he took inconspicuousness to a new level and really, amazingly, did nothing at all. Trezeguet was truly a waste of space and shouldn’t have been in the XI.

France would certainly have fared better for the inclusion of Govou instead, who immediately highlighted Trezeguet’s ineptitude (not that there was a need for it) by quickly making an impact when he came on as a substitute – darting about and linking up well.

There is, of course, an argument that he had no service – and in all the time that he was on the pitch only one cross came into the box – but if France were going to play a game that didn’t include providing crosses for centre forwards in its strategy then that is all the more reason why Trezeguet shouldn’t have played.

Anelka, of course, was another matter entirely and in fact is looking the best he has done in almost a decade. Last night he was constantly involved and showed a willingness collect the ball and to try to work with other players in order to create something. He seems to have settled into a role for France and is becoming a key figure in the build-up of our attacks.

Its hard to judge how well the defence performed, because if France were uninspired England didn’t even have a clue. England were chasing shadows for most of the game and although there were stretches where they had good possession they never managed nearly enough dangerous balls into the box. Barring a few alarming moments when Joe Cole Mary-Poppinsed his way into the box the defence were largely untroubled.

That said, with Ashley Cole sinking to new levels of ineptitude and Brown clearly out of his depth, Clerc and Abidal should certainly have done better going forward. Clerc made the odd run forward and while he did provide the through-ball that led to the penalty he wasn’t the dangerous dynamo we saw for Lyon against Manchester United.

Abidal was criminal in his apathy, as he once again treated us to his aloof amble, this time not even bothering to try to reach the final third of the field. One would never guess that Evra and Clichy were having impressive seasons and strengthening their arguments for a chance in the starting XI.

Toulalan, while he didn’t play badly, he unfortunately didn’t offer much. With him in the team we lacked combatitiveness and creativity in the midfield – especially with Malouda seemingly absolved from tackling duties.

It seems odd to say that we weren’t combatitive, but what happened in the match was that Toulalan and Makelele lay far too deeply and often let England have the possession. Also, at the times when he was right in the middle of the field it was evident that he lacked support and it is clear that him and Makelele together are too defensively minded.

It is the same problem that we often have when Makelele plays with zimmer-frame Vieira, who of late has struggled to get into the second-half of the field. Surely Domenech’s loyalty is misplaced here – we can’t accommodate two aging players in the defensive midfield role.

And as long as Domenech continues to favour both Makelele and Vieira together France remains a team on the wrong side of a transition, with a creaking midfield near to breaking point. Whether we’ll manage to continue to disguise our frailties in Euro 2008 or whether the group of death will be Vieira and Makelele’s funeral pyre we will soon see.

The next three friendlies against South American opposition will be very important for Domenech as he tries to (re-)animate his veterans and muster them for one final charge – again.

France

Goals: 1 – Franck Ribery (Pen)

Team: Coupet, Abidal, Thuram, Gallas, Clerc, Makelele, Toulalan, Ribery, Malouda, Anelka (D. Cisse 80), Trezeguet (Govou 64)

England

Goals: 0

Team: Robinson, A. Cole, Ferdinand, Terry (Lescott 46), Brown (Johnson 63), Hargreaves, Barry, J. Cole (Downing 46), Beckham (Bentley 63), Gerrard (Crouch 46), Rooney (Owen 46)


Actions

Information

7 responses

27 03 2008
Annabelle

Domenech seemed pretty pleased with Trezeguet and to be fair to him I can’t remember seeing a decent cross in the box. But saying that I don’t think he should be included in our squad for the Euro, Henry and Anelka are definitely first choice, then who knows…Govou…and why not Sinama-Pongolle (well anyone but Cissé).

In midfield, Malouda should make way for Rothen. His delivery of the ball in the box is excellent and crosses always pin point accurate plus works hard on pitch, he defends, attacks and creates a lot of spaces for his team mates…
I don’t really rate Toulalan, I’d rather see Bodmer in midfield. He was excellent against Mali on Tuesday night.

Ax

27 03 2008
jean pierre

Haha! Annabelle! Good to have your comments.

I wonder if Domenech is just keeping Trezeguet sweet, should he find himself in need of Trezeguet in the near future again.

Yes, there weren’t any crosses played in for him, but then why was he there? Its not as if we were under serious pressure and weren’t able to put in the crosses – it must’ve been part of the strategy to play that way. If not, we are truly that rubbish at crossing, then he still shouldn’t play, as we could rather have someone in there who can link up with the play.

As you say, though, this will hopefully not turn out to be a big issue once Henry and Benzema are fit again, ’cause it seems that Trezeguet is 4th choice behind them and Anelka. And, like you, I’d be quite happy to see Govou in there ahead of him too.

That is all, of course, unless we were able to develop a crossing game, in which instance Trezeguet deserves another proper look.

Based on what I’ve seen of Rothen I’d agree with you. If nothing else Malouda needs a shake-up to realise that his place isn’t cemented in the team.

I’ve seen very little of Bodmer, but I know he had a very good season last year and has continued to play well. Personally I think we have enough defensive/combatitive midfielders and that Toulalan shouldn’t even be playing as it is. We are looking far too much at defensive midfielders – can’t we experiment more with creative midfielders?

If anything, one defensive midfielder should be enough and if we are going to play two then one of them certainly has to be more dynamic. Thats why I favour L. Diarra. I’d also like to see Flamini in that position.

27 03 2008
Annabelle

I think Domenech is just playing mind games…Trezeguet is good player but he’s a “fox in the box”, he is a good finisher in the 6 yard box and that’s about it. He doesn’t take on players, I’m not really sure what he does apart from well….standing in the box and waiting for the ball to land on his feet or head. Whereas Anelka, Henry and Benzema are always moving around, they can cross, take on players etc…

Domenech is too stubborn to change his tactics or starting 11. Everyone knows how good Guily and Pires are but they did the stupidest thing they could have done: they told the press what they thought of Domenech. Mexes did the same and although he’s been called up in the squad for the last few games, he hasn’t played (well he has but for France A’). Anelka did the right thing, he did all the talking on the pitch….

I’d like to see Lassana Diarra as well, I think he’ll go to the Euro, Viera will be first choice then Toulalan. As much as I like Flamini, he’s unlikely to be included in the squad for the Euro. I’m pretty sure Domenech already has his list of 20 players in mind and unless some of them get injured before the start of the Euro, it won’t change!

31 03 2008
ced

hey everybody,

that is a very good website and glad to see anna’s comments! well, cant wait the Euro, but i am a little worried as France has not yet found the right tempo. I really hope to see viera at his best because when he plays well, france is on a different level. We also have to count on riberys form as he has the potential to bring sparks to the game. Concerning Trezeguet, i really think that he has his role to play even if he starts on the bench….

ced

31 03 2008
jean pierre

ANNABELLE:

Yeah, its a pity about Pires and an even bigger one about Giuly…! As you say, thank goodness Anelka kept his mouth shut. But then again, he’s antagonised every other manager and so perhaps he’s finally come to his senses and grown up a bit!

I agree that Domenech probably knows his 20 – probably his starting 11. And, I suppose, in one way thats a good thing, at least the team has some stability.

Its a pity about Flamini, I agree with you, since he hasn’t forced himself into the picture by now he’s unlikely to feature in the summer. Lets hope that Diarra gets a runout again, though.

CED:

I’m very glad you like the site!

Can’t wait for the Euros either, but I too am a little worried. I think you’re right about the tempo, that is definitely something we’re lacking. As you pointed out, its one of our big strength, and with our team’s technique, passing ability and speed, there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be playing like that.

I also hope that Vieira finally brings the goods. I wouldn’t be surprised if he pulls it out of the bag for the Euros, as he probably senses it may be his last tournament. That said, I am very dubious about how long Vieira can sustain a top level performance standard, since, in the last two years, he hasn’t managed to string more than one good game together.

Ribery has gone from strength to strength and he will be the key for us in the summer. It is a little worrying, though, how overly reliant on him we are.

Trezeguet can most definitely play a role. My only hope is that if Domenech decides to field him that he at least uses a strategy that plays to his strengths. If not then he is a waste of space.

Thanks for commenting and hope you visit the site during the upcoming tournament.

31 03 2008
Stephane F.

yo yo

Welcome to the site Ced!

Personally i think Trez is washed up for France, and there should not be a place for him at the Euros, barring injuries. We simply have too many good players for him to be taking a spot on the bench and coming on for 5 mins.

As for Vieira, it’s been time for him to step aside for a while now, but he was huge, H-U-G-E in the world cup and i cant stop thinking about that. the question is, is he worth playing for 65mins? cause thats all i think he can realistically offer. and is it worth having a player in the squad who might not be able to play consecutive games due to injuries, and who’s impact is already potentially limited? unfortunately, the way Domenech lines up his teams, he seems quite happy to just slot in Toulalan in Vieira’s place. i think this stiffles our creativity. perhaps we’re underestimating his worth as a captain, as a “warrior”.

i hope Domenech uses our next 3 friendlies to interchange a few players, say Rothen for Malouda, or L. Diarra for Toulalan, Benzema for Anelka/Henry, Evra for Abidal. It’s clear he has his strategy and that’s not going to change, but i’d like some ‘fringe’ players to get some starts. I think we’ll see Nasri get some A team minutes, he could be a very key substitute if he starts playing with confidence (as it seems he did vs Mali).

A last note on the England game, i was very disappointed our fullbacks couldnt exploit England’s defense more. Clerc was so excellent for Lyon vs Man U and he did ok vs England (namely that through pass to Anelka) but i expected more. And Abidal, well JP u said it best in your report. in light of the fact that we have some very good left backs, id like to see Abidal develop more as a centre back, to possibly replace Thuram, and give Evra a chance to go down the wing. I just thought that with England’s ineptitude at fullback, we could exploit that.

31 03 2008
Annabelle

This article in l’équipe sums it all: http://www.lequipe.fr/Football/Euro_EDF_23_apres_ANG.html

Bottom line is, if a player is under performing and has been for a while then he shouldn’t be in the starting 11. Malouda, Abidal, Viera have not been playing well for quite some time now (Viera is definitely not match fit because of all his various injuries) but Domenech keeps them in the starting 11 because he knows their “potential” and hoping they will have eventually a good game or maybe two? It’s a gamble and it could easily cost us a spot in the quarters! like Steph said, I hope he uses the next 3 friendlies to interchange a few players especially in the midfield…

I might go to Paris to watch either France-Colombia on June, 3rd or PSG’s last home game against St Etienne on May, 9th. Anyone up for it?

Ax

Leave a comment